Hi All,
I just heard from Roger Pitt @ DSE. He has been kind enough to advise us to use the following email address to send our responses to the track closure proposals.
richard.wadsworth@dse.vic.gov.auFor those of you who are can't be bothered typing your own response feel free to copy and paste mine into an email to Richard.
PLEASE ALSO POST A COPY OF YOUR LETTER HERE TO GIVE OTHERS IDEAS OF WHAT TO POST. Keep it civil !
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Dear Richard,
Having had the opportunity to view the 20 proposed road and track closures in the North East region I am extremely disappointed in the reasoning given by the DSE to close tracks.
For the DSE to state that because a track has no operational purpose to the DSE that it should be closed completely ignores the fact that the majority of these tracks are of use and in use regularly by members of the public such as myself.
Furthermore my experience is that much of the works that the DSE do to rehabilitate tracks results in the the tracks being significantly easier for all vehicles to use. The DSE's removal of the challenging tracks results in significantly more traffic that we would otherwise get in sensitive areas.
By improving some of the tracks to a state where a high clearance 2wd family sedan could traverse them we have seen a rise in the proportion of high speed crashes because bikes and cars are able to travel significantly faster along the tracks that have been significantly improved by the DSE.
In many cases the lack of challenging tracks available to bush users pushes people who want a challenge to create their own. Although I don't support people putting in single track. We all know that whatever action the DSE takes to close single tracks and interesting 4wd tracks determined bush users will find a way around - creating more damage than the original track did.
Why not leave the challenging tracks in the network and mark them as so. A sign at each end of a track saying "Caution - Track in poor condition - Traverse With Care" would give a far better result for all concerned than simply closing it.
For example. The last group ride I went on in the Eildon area we organised a bush refuel jus so that we could ride No 5, Snob's No 6 and Second Creek Track as BECAUSE THEY ARE A CHALLENGE.
I am calling on the DSE take the actions indicated in brackets instead of closing the following tracks.
Rubicon/Eildon
Second Creek Track (Signpost and leave it alone)
No 5 Track (Signpost and leave it alone)
Snobs No 6 Track (Signpost and leave it alone)
Strathbogies Forrest
#1 Track (Close the surrounding unmapped tracks)
Goulburn Forrest
Abbots Creek Track (Signpost and leave it alone)
Black Range Forrest
Buxton Spur Track (The section of track is not in a plantation. Public Roads and Tracks tracks through timber leases DO NOT override the public right to use those roads and tracks).
Mount Disappointment
Track #2 (Leave it alone - The track is not a danger to anyone)
Poison Link Track
Track #6 (There is no evidence to support damage being done to the water supply by these tracks near the catchment area)
Track #7 (Put a sign at either end on the the tracks that have hazards and leave them alone.)
Sincerely,
Paul Smith
Member of AMTRA
Taxpayer and track user !
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *