Yeah: but my reading of the letter is that he thinks there
will be a change? TAC may cover the bills but the careless drive charge would/ could apply. Therefore if brought before a court and found guilty an impost of costs / possibly TAC payments may/ could apply?
At least thats my interpretation of the letter. So if the police think that its(carelss driving offence) if you go there & cant ride (to his standards) or the weather is bad (again to his standards) or the track conditions are bad (again his standards) Then you would be charged
Or given these indicators it would be illegal even if you didnt have an accident! You would then possibly be breaking the law/s beacuse of road condition, ability, weather?
??
Now a very simple person just like me, would say why cant we ride a registered vehicle while licensed on a public road without fear of conviction if I have an accident and injure myself? I concure that the SES, emergency services & police are our un sung heros in times of trouble. But I wouldnt expect anyone to lay their life on the line for me to save me.
However that is not to say that the police in these areas dont see plenty of stupid things done by fools! I guess frustration in saving fools would see me also trying to legislate against people doing stupid stuff if I were in their shoes.
BUT: you cant legislate brains into anyone.
I would say that if a legislation were to pass that does encomapss the charges as laid out here it would be bloody sad day at best.
I hope I'm wrong in my assumption!